EUDR Faces New Setback as EU Parliament Rejects Country Risk System

The EPP - the largest party in the European Parliament - is pushing for "negligible risk" pathway to be added to the country benchmarking system.


Thu 10 Jul 25

SHARE

The EUDR – Europe’s signature deforestation regulation – is facing crisis after the European Parliament voted to reject the benchmarking system, which categorised more than 190 different countries based on their risk of deforestation.

It comes after a motion led by Alexander Bernhuber of the European People’s Party (EPP) and supported by the majority of MEP’s argued that the system suffered from a series of flaws, including the use of outdated data that “does not accurately reflect the current realities in the countries concerned,” and “fails to consider key real-world factors, most notably current land-use dynamics and forest degradation,” resulting in countries being placed in higher risk categories.

11948900 800x450 1.jpg
Last year, Peter Liese, a prominent German Member of the European Parliament (MEP) and the EPP’s environment spokesperson spearheaded the opposition to the EUDR’s imminent enforcement. (Photo Credit: EPA-EFE/RONALD WITTEK)

Wood Central understands that the motion also stated that the EUDR’s inclusion of only three risk categories – low, standard, and high risk – was “insufficient to adequately differentiate between countries with vastly different levels of deforestation risk.” It follows the EPP’s success last year in integrating a new “no-risk” category into Parliament’s negotiating position on the EUDR, although the category did not make it into the agreement between Parliament and the European Council.

That agreement, however, delayed the implementation of the law by a year, with the EUDR now becoming applicable for large companies in December 2025 and for micro- and small enterprises in June 2026. The Commission had proposed the delay, noting that “several global partners have repeatedly expressed concerns about their state of preparedness,” and adding that even within the EU, “the state of preparations amongst stakeholders in Europe is also uneven.”

loading of illegally logged trees, from rainforests of Papua New Guinea, onto cargo ship in Paia inlet, Gulf Province, PNG.
Under the country benchmarking system, just four countries are classified as ‘high-risk’ (Russia, Belarus, North Korea, and Myanmar—all with current EU sanctions), 49 are ‘standard risk’, and 141 are ‘low risk’ – including timber coming from Papua New Guinea. (Photo Credit: Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert / Alamy Stock Photo)
WWF slams the European Parliament over EUDR circus

The latest setback has been met with criticism from ENGOs, including the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), which claims that the vote “represents an irresponsible move against one of the EU’s flagship environmental laws,” with the inclusion of a “insignificant or negligible risk (category) – absent from the legal text of the EUDR…causing more burden for companies that have already set up systems, and undermine the legal certainty that businesses urgently need.”

According to Anke Schulmeister-Oldenhove, Manager of Forests at WWF European Policy Office, the “Parliament seems to be blind to the ongoing climate crisis, putting the EUDR’s credibility and the EU’s climate leadership at risk, and sending the wrong signal at the worst possible time as global deforestation rates spiral out of control. The European Commission must now stay the course and implement the EUDR, not be distracted by this political posturing.”

Author

  • Jason Ross, publisher, is a 15-year professional in building and construction, connecting with more than 400 specifiers. A Gottstein Fellowship recipient, he is passionate about growing the market for wood-based information. Jason is Wood Central's in-house emcee and is available for corporate host and MC services.

    View all posts
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Articles