Canada Takes Fight Over 2% Lumber Dumping Test to US Appeals Court

The US Commerce Department rejected the same price threshold in a 2008 steel nails case, saying it ignored price swings specific to each market.


Wed 30 September 26

SHARE

A coalition of Canadian lumber producers, led by the federal government, is fighting a US dumping investigation hidden behind higher-priced sales, with the Commerce Department finding significant price gaps across more than 99 per cent of Canfor’s and West Fraser’s American sales by value. It comes as the coalition filed a notice of appeal last Wednesday, after the US Court of International Trade upheld the test in July.

“Commerce reasonably determined that prices differed significantly,” Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves ruled in New York, rejecting claims that the test produced arbitrary results. Canfor and West Fraser were the two producers Commerce examined in its review of 2021 shipments, and on the recalculation, the department set their dumping margins at 5.25 per cent and 7.06 per cent.

The appeal now goes to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the court that ruled against Commerce’s old statistical test in an unrelated case last year. Commerce dropped the measure to comply with that ruling and brought in a test that treats a price gap of 2 per cent or more as significant.

Stacks of red-wrapped Canfor Spruceland lumber packs in front of sawmill cyclones and steel framework.
Bundled Canfor Spruceland lumber awaits dispatch at a Canadian sawmill. Canfor was one of the two producers Commerce examined for 2021, and its dumping margin held at 5.25 per cent when the department recalculated. (Photo Credit: Canfor)

Coalition members argued that US lumber prices swing outside their control, evidence they said “dispels the notion that targeted dumping is occurring at all.” They also noted Commerce rejected a 2 per cent test in a 2008 steel nails case, saying it “does not account for price variations specific to the market in question.”

In reply, Commerce said its old nails test shared only the 2 per cent threshold with the new one, a line it already applies elsewhere in its dumping rules. Sawmill owner Sierra Pacific Industries and the US lumber industry committee that brought the original dumping case sided with Commerce, arguing the open-ended word “significantly” gives the department flexibility.

The granite entrance wall of the US Court of International Trade's James L. Watson Courthouse beside a revolving glass door.
The US Court of International Trade’s James L. Watson Courthouse in New York, where Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves ruled Commerce’s 2 per cent threshold reasonable. (Photo Credit: ID 42705573 © Bigapplestock | Dreamstime.com)

Canada has fought Commerce’s method on more than one front, appealing a World Trade Organization panel’s findings on it in 2019. It took this review to the trade court three years ago, whilst sending its challenge to that year’s subsidy duties to a panel under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement.

As it stands, the Government of Canada expects Commerce to issue final rates in its seventh review next month, with cash deposits set in the sixth review holding until then. Those antidumping and countervailing deposits are charged on top of the 10 per cent Section 232 tariff on softwood lumber imports, which took effect last October.

Author

  • J Ross headshot

    Jason Ross, publisher, is a 15-year professional in building and construction, connecting with more than 400 specifiers. A Gottstein Fellowship recipient, he is passionate about growing the market for wood-based information. Jason is Wood Central's in-house emcee and is available for corporate host and MC services.

    View all posts

Related Articles