AD SPACE HERE

Would Trump Scrap Plans to End Old-Growth Logging Next Year?

In June, President Biden published a new plan following an Executive Order that vowed to halt logging in old-growth forests just months after the election.


Tue 22 Oct 24

SHARE

Less than two weeks before the election, the future of logging remains a hot-button political issue, with Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump clashing over how old-growth forests should be managed.

It comes as Republicans have vowed to repeal President Biden’s signature climate change law, which passed Congress without a single Republican in favour, with GOP leaders promising to repel it if Trump wins the electionwho now leads Harris 51/49 according to election aggregator Five-Thirty-Eight.

In recent months, House Republicans and House Democrats have clashed on logging, with President Biden, in June, promising to “effectively halt all logging in old-growth forests” after his administration published a plan, which, if Harris is elected, will apply to more than 32 million acres of forests managed by the US Forest Service and the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management.

It comes after officials rejected a blanket prohibition on old-growth logging (and mature forests), which environmentalists have long sought. Officials concluded that a sweeping ban on old-growth forests would make it harder to thin forests to better protect communities against wildfires that have grown more severe as the planet has warmed.

“To ensure the longevity of old-growth forests, we’re going to have to take proactive management to protect against wildfire, insects and disease,” Forest Service Deputy Chief Chris French told the Associated Press. “Without some thinning allowed on these forests,” he said, “there is a risk of losing more trees.”

What are Old-Growth forests, how do they differ from mature forests? Footage courtesy of @HarvardMuseumofNaturalHistory.
The US Forest Service argues that the impact on the timber industry will be minimal.

If enacted, the new rules are unlikely to placate the timber industry and Republicans, who have opposed any new restrictions.

However, Mr French asserts that the impacts on timber companies would be minimal: “There are so little timber sales that occur right now in old-growth … that the overall effects are very small,” he said.

According to government data, the timber industry employs 860,000 people, about 30% fewer than in 2001. In recent years, much of their work has shifted to timber from private and state lands after harvests from national forests dropped sharply in the 1990s due to new policies and changing lumber markets.

The new analysis comes after a separate report on threats to old-growth forests concluded that wildfires, insects and disease had been the main killers of old-growth trees since 2000, accounting for almost 1,400 square miles (3,600 square kilometres) of losses.

By contrast, logging on federal lands reduced old-growth forests to about 14 square miles (36 square kilometres). Timber industry representatives have seized on that figure, arguing that further restrictions are unnecessary.

“A binding restriction on timber harvest is not where their priority ought to be,” said Bill Imbergamo of the Federal Forest Resource Coalition, an industry group. He added that exceptions by federal officials to allow some logging could be challenged in court, which could tie up even small logging projects focused on reducing wildfire risks.

Biden’s executive order: Democrats to end native logging by 2025

The plan comes after an executive order signed by the president on Earth Day in 2022, directing the US Forest Service and the Land Management Bureau to conduct an inventory of old-growth and mature forests and develop policies to protect them.

The commitment follows through on a 2022 Executive Order made on World Earth Day. However, it will be conditional on President Biden being elected next year. Footage courtesy of @abcnews.

“We think this will allow us to respond effectively and strategically to the biggest threats that face old growth,” Biden’s Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told the Washington Post in December. “At the end of the day, it will protect not just the forests but also the culture and heritage connected to the forests.”

The US Forest Service oversees 193 million acres (or 78 million hectares) of forests and grasslands, of which 144 million (58 million hectares) are forests.  Its inventory found that 80% was either old-growth or mature forests, with 32 million acres (12 million hectares) and 80 million (32 million hectares) of mature forests on federal land.

The Land Management Bureau defines old-growth forests as those with trees in later stages of stand development, typically at least 120 years of growth, depending on species. In 2022, shortly before Biden announced his executive order, a group of more than 130 scientists wrote a letter to Biden advocating a ban on logging in old-growth forests.

“Older forests provide the most above-ground carbon storage potential on Earth, with mature forests and larger trees driving the most accumulation of forest carbon in the critical next few decades,” the letter read. “Left vulnerable to logging, though, they cannot fulfil these vital functions.”

The ban, conditional on Vice President Harris’s election, will come into effect months after the inauguration, allowing the Forest Service to finalise rules protecting old-growth forests from logging. 

Under President Donald Trump, federal officials sought to open up huge areas of West Coast forests to potential logging. That policy was reversed in 2021 after federal wildlife officials determined that appointees under the Trump administration used faulty science to justify drastically shrinking areas of forest that are considered crucial habitats for endangered species.

Old-growth forests: When does a forest grow old?

President Biden’s order to protect the nation’s oldest forests has raised a simple yet vexing question: When does a forest grow old?

Old-growth forests, such as Northern California’s storied giant sequoia stands, have layers of undisturbed trees and vegetation. There’s wide consensus on the importance of preserving them — symbolically and practically because their trunks and branches store large amounts of carbon that can be released when forests burn, adding to climate change.

As the nation developed over the past few centuries, most old-growth forests were lost to logging. Yet pockets of ancient trees remain, scattered across the U.S., including in California, the Pacific Northwest and areas of the Rocky Mountains. Larger expanses of old growth survive in Alaska, such as within the Tongass National Forest.

Author

  • Jason Ross

    Jason Ross, publisher, is a 15-year professional in building and construction, connecting with more than 400 specifiers. A Gottstein Fellowship recipient, he is passionate about growing the market for wood-based information. Jason is Wood Central's in-house emcee and is available for corporate host and MC services.

spot_img

Related Articles